Why Intelligent Life May Be Impossible Around Most Stars

The universe presents two profound mysteries concerning existence that have long puzzled researchers. Recent analysis from Cool Wars Lab research offers a potential solution with significant implications for the prevalence of extraterrestrial life. A key observation involves stellar demographics: M-dwarf stars constitute a staggering 82% of all stars, making them 33 times more common than G-type stars, which account for less than 2.5%. This imbalance forms the basis of the first existential puzzle.

To illustrate this statistical disparity, consider a thought experiment involving national origin guessing. If a person were forced to guess between a group containing the top 60 most populous nations or a group containing the next 12, the odds of survival would heavily favor the larger group. The split between M-dwarfs and G-type stars mirrors this, meaning observers are statistically far more likely to originate from the rarer G-type star environment.

The second puzzle relates to stellar lifespan. M-dwarfs possess lifespans extending to 10 trillion years, vastly exceeding the 10 billion years typical for G-type stars like the Sun. This longevity means M-dwarfs will litter the cosmos for eons. Furthermore, recent exoplanet studies indicate these common stars frequently host rocky planets within habitable zones. The puzzle is why intelligent life appears so early, within the first 1% of the universe's Stelliferous period, rather than later around these long-lived M-dwarfs.

It is highly surprising that observers do not live around an M-dwarf.

Producing in-depth analysis requires significant effort, and support from partners like Incogn is crucial. This service focuses on protecting individuals from pervasive online data scraping, where personal details are frequently harvested and sold to data brokers without consent, leading to risks like fraud or phishing attacks.

For those seeking to secure their online presence, Incogn provides an exclusive introductory offer. An annual plan receives a 60% discount by visiting incogn.com/coolworlds and applying the codec coolworlds at checkout.

Several potential explanations exist for the two observed cosmic puzzles. Researchers move beyond simple dismissal, investigating physical or temporal mechanisms that could bias the emergence of observers toward G-type stars or early cosmic epochs.

The new paper applies Bayesian statistics to these puzzles. The model incorporates both a critical mass ($M_{crit}$) below which stars are inhospitable, and a temporal window ($T_{win}$) limiting planetary life duration. The Luck Hypothesis is implicitly tested by evaluating the model where both $M_{crit}$ and $T_{win}$ effects are negated.

The core task in this Bayesian framework involves inferring the probability distribution, specifically the joint posterior, which represents the probability of observing various values for $M_{crit}$ and $T_{win}$ given the existing data—the two cosmic puzzles.

Bayes' theorem expands conditional probabilities. The key terms are the likelihood function, which is the probability of observing the data given a specific choice of parameters ($M_{crit}$ and $T_{win}$); the parameter prior, often assumed to be flat and uninformative; and the Bayesian evidence, which represents the overall probability of observing the data under the model assumptions.

The likelihood function necessitates incorporating established astrophysical laws. These include the changing rate of star formation, which peaked 10 billion years ago (cosmic noon), the calculated lifetimes of stars (M-dwarfs persisting up to 10 trillion years, based on work by Fred Adams and Greg Laughlin), and the Initial Mass Function (IMF), which details the fraction of stars born at different masses.

By integrating these laws, researchers simulated the evolution of 1 million stars across cosmic history. The simulation plots the number of suitable stars for observers over time, treating the hectic pre-main sequence phase as inhospitable. The resulting curve initially rises as star formation peaks, then gradually declines as even the longest-lived M-dwarfs eventually exhaust their fuel near the 10 trillion year mark.

Gradually increasing the mass cutoff ($M_{crit}$) shifts this curve toward the left on the timeline. As the cutoff approaches the mass of the Sun, the current age of the universe begins to look less like an outlier and more like a typical observation point. A similar effect is achieved by truncating the habitable window ($T_{win}$).

However, a key issue with this model is that it only explains puzzle two. Why do observers live so early in the universe? It has no ability to explain puzzle one.

When comparing models using the Bayes Factor—the ratio of evidences—the Truncated Window hypothesis performs poorly against the Desolate M-dwarf scenario because it fails to account for why observers are not around M-dwarfs.

The comparison between the model incorporating physical constraints ($M_{crit}$ and $T_{win}$) and the pure Luck scenario yields a Bayes Factor of 1,600 to one. This magnitude is classified as decisive evidence, far exceeding the conventional threshold of 100 to one used in scientific discovery.

When comparing the two main physical hypotheses directly, the Truncated Window hypothesis is beaten by the Desolate M-dwarf scenario. Whether combined or isolated, the models converge on the conclusion that stars below approximately half the mass of the Sun are inhospitable to the development of observers.

Fixing the habitable window duration to 10 billion years—which aligns with geophysical predictions for plate tectonics—results in the smallest possible mass cutoff, excluding 2/3 of all stars in the universe from developing observers at 95% confidence.

This analysis yields a profound result concerning the emergence of intelligent observers. If two-thirds of all stars cannot support observers, the question arises regarding the emergence of simpler life forms around these stars. While simple life might form, it is difficult to conceive of a mechanism preventing its evolution to complexity based on stellar properties alone, unlike the known issues surrounding M-dwarfs.

M-dwarfs present clear environmental challenges. After formation, they can spend up to a billion years emitting intense, high-energy radiation, potentially stripping orbiting planets of essential water and atmospheres. Initial studies of the rocky planets orbiting the M-dwarf TRAPPIST 1, utilizing the James Webb Space Telescope, have yet to detect atmospheres on several worlds, strongly suggesting the inner planets are barren rocks.

Despite the adage concerning 'lies, damn lies, and statistics,' the derived odds of 1,600 to 1 are too substantial to dismiss as mere random chance. This figure significantly surpasses the canonical threshold scientists use to declare a discovery, such as a new planet.

Accepting this statistical finding naturally resolves not only the core puzzles but also recent findings from the James Webb Space Telescope and the Fermi Paradox. Furthermore, since stars heavier than about 1.6 solar masses have lifetimes too short for evolution to proceed fully, the universe might possess a 'solar ceiling' limiting the emergence of intelligent life.

The Bayes Factor quantifies the extent to which the data supports one hypothesis over another. It dictates the factor by which prior beliefs must shift upon observing the data. Even if prior beliefs strongly favored M-dwarfs as habitable, the Bayes Factor mandates a belief adjustment by a factor of roughly 1,000, demonstrating the ironclad influence of the observational evidence on scientific conclusion.

The conclusion that low-mass stars fail to develop observers provides the most robust explanation for current observations. This scientific hypothesis is eminently falsifiable; if civilizations are found to develop around M-dwarfs without relying on interstellar colonization, the claim would be invalidated.

If interstellar colonization is widespread, observers might exist around M-dwarfs that originated elsewhere, creating a scenario where current observers are not representative samples. However, barring such large-scale migration, M-dwarfs should remain quiet environments regarding the emergence of intelligence. This represents the most likely position based on available data.

Barring interstellar colonization, Endwarfs should be very quiet places. That is the most likely position based on the available data.

The Cool Worlds channel strives to present unique research group findings, such as the paper discussed in this video. This work is supported by dedicated patrons who enable the continuation of this research endeavor.

Individuals interested in supporting this scientific exploration can contribute via a link provided in the description, with support available from as low as the cost of a coffee per month.